(see also Multiple Ways to do Neurofeedback)

This a sensitive topic in the field. There is more than one group that has claimed finding “the right way” to do neurofeedback. When you talk to many experienced clinicians, they tend to use a variety of options and methods. Most tell you no one approach works for everyone. Every brain is different and responds differently to training.

For instance, training alpha occipitally was the first model for neurofeedback back in the 1960’s. Then came Dr. Barry Sterman in the early 70’s whose research showed great benefit for training the Sensory Motor Rhythm along the sensory motor strip.

Since then, more models have arrived:

• The arousal model
• The instability model
• The chaos theory non-linear dynamic model
• The train to the qEEG model (which is actually multiple models)
• Squash, training down all amplitudes across multiple frequencies
• Alpha-synchrony model
• Interhemispheric training
• “Sweet spot” training
• The use of ratio training
• The “mini-map” model
• Reducing theta for ADD

There are even more, depending on how you define them. This list doesn’t even get into the mixed models issues, for those who combine other types of systems into the process that are feedback, but aren’t EEG Biofeedback.

So which one do you use? Which is the best? There are multiple ways to do neurofeedback. Many clinicians may use more than one.

But you need to start with one that is solid, basic, successful, and is something to build on.

We have some recommendations about how to choose models and systems. In the future, we will explain each of these models in more depth. They all have adherents, and we have colleagues who are proponents of each model. You just have to know what’s a good fit for various situations. Most importantly, get the best training possible, and the best teachers, no matter what model you choose. There are reasons we might start with one approach versus another, but it also depends very much on what the clinician’s own requirements are. There are no perfect answers, but we do have some criteria for why we might recommend one over another for various situations.